COVID-19 Alert   We have changed our procedures for COVID-19.   Learn More
What to consider when laying off employees due to COVID-19. Learn More

  • Senate Defeats Fair Pay Restoration Act: Ledbetter Reigns

    In 2007, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a female employee who was paid less than her male counterparts failed to timely file her discrimination suit because the disparate pay was instigated years before she actually found out about the pay differential. The court, in Ledbetter v. Goodyear, rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the statute of limitations begins to run each time the employer issues a new paycheck with the disparate pay. Instead, the court decided that the discrimination occurred when the employer initially decided to pay the female employee less
    than the male employees, even though the female employee had no idea she was being paid less.

    The House immediately passed a bill to change the law, but the Senate version languished significantly longer. The Senate bill was defeated yesterday in a 56-42 vote (the bill required 60 votes to pass). According to the Wall Street Journal, “The outcome wasn’t a surprise, as Democrats acknowledged ahead of time that it was unlikely they would overcome Republican opposition.” As a result, the Ledbetter case continues to be the law. As it currently stands, employees who believe they are the victim of discrimination must file an administrative claim with the EEOC within 180 days (300 days in California) of the initial discriminatory decision, not within 180 days of the effect of the discriminatory act.

    The Law Office of Phillip J. Griego
    95 South Market Street, Suite 520
    San Jose, CA 95113
    Tel. 408-293-6341
    Original article by Robert E. Nuddleman, former associate of The Law Office of Phillip J. Griego.

    Feel free to suggest topics for the blog. We are happy to consider topics pertaining to general points of Labor and Employment Law, but we cannot answer questions about specific situations or provide legal advice. If you desire legal advice, you should contact an attorney.

    Your use of this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Office of Phillip J. Griego. The use of the Internet or this blog for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be posted in this blog and the Law Office of Phillip J. Griego cannot guarantee the confidentiality of anything posted to this blog.

    Phillip J. Griego represents employees and businesses throughout Silicon Valley and the greater San Francisco Bay Area including Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Mountain View, Los Altos, San Jose, the South Bay Area, Campbell, Los Gatos, Cupertino, Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Sunnyvale, Santa Cruz, Saratoga, and Alameda, San Mateo, Santa Clara, San Benito, Mendocino, and Calaveras counties.